Find a Clinical Trial

Print this page
ProtocolTrial Name and Objective
041001

Accelerated, Hypofractionated Post-Mastectomy Radiation Therapy in Women with Breast Cancer: A Phase II Trial

This study is a non-randomized, single arm study of female patients with invasive carcinoma of the breast who have had (or will have) a mastectomy followed by radiation therapy. The term 'accelerated' means that a higher radiation dose per treatment will be delivered over a shorter period of time (compared to the standard). Prior studies suggest that the accelerated radiation scheme used in this study is comparable to the standard or conventional whole breast radiation. That is, the evidence points to accelerated treatments may work at least as well as the longer, standard treatments. Along with measuring the recurrence outcomes, we will be measuring treatment side effects and cosmesis (how well the study treatment plan preserves the appearance of your surgically reconstructed breast).
(More)


041209

The INFORM Study: Randomized Phase II trial of Neoadjuvant Cisplatin vs. Doxorubicin/Cyclophosphamide in Women with Newly Diagnosed Breast Cancer and Germline BRCA Mutations

The main goal of this study is to determine if the pathologic complete response (pCR) rate (determined by the Miller-Payne method 1) to neoadjuvant cisplatin is at least 20% greater than the pCR to doxorubicin/ cyclophosphamide (AC) in women with newly diagnosed breast cancer and a germline BRCA mutation.
(More)


040406

Effect of DNA Variations on Breast Cancer Risk and Recurrence. A Study of The Cancer Institute of New Jersey Oncology Group (CINJOG)

The purpose of this study is to collect, store and analyze deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) from patients. Your genes are inherited from your parents and they are in part responsible for why you are different from other people. These slight differences in genes among people are called polymorphisms. By collecting DNA from patients with cancer and without, scientists will be able to study whether these polymorphisms are important in determining the occurrence of cancer and how patients respond to cancer treatments. For example, having a particular polymorphism in a gene may affect the type of side effects you may have from certain drugs during treatment compared to a person who does not have this polymorphism.
Recently several SNPs in particular genes have been identified that may play a role in the earlier development of breast cancer. We want to determine if these SNPs are seen more often in patients with breast cancer as compared with patients of the same age without a diagnosis of breast cancer. We also want to determine if these SNPs are seen more often in patients experiencing a breast cancer recurrence than those remaining cancer-free.
(More)


130503

Environmental Determinants of Puberty. A Pilot Study

To test the feasibility of conducting a cohort study of prepubertal girls in New Jersey and allow us to learn essential information for the planning of such future study.
(More)


040703

Significance of Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms in Breast Cancer Patients Undergoing Radiation Therapy

In a cohort of approximately 250 women, diagnosed with breast cancer and treated with breast conserving surgery or mastectomy and radiation we will evaluate the frequency of this polymorphism (SNP309). We will correlate the polymorphism status with other clinical, pathologic and genetic information we have on these 250 women, including but not limited to stage, age of onset of disease, receptor status, her2 status, and the status of BRCA1 and BRCA2. We will recruit additional patients with a new diagnosis of breast cancer to correlate the status of SNP309 with other clinical and pathological variables.
(More)


051302

JNJ-42756493: A Phase 1 Study to Evaluate the Safety, Pharmacokinetics, and Pharmacodynamics of JNJ-42756493, a pan-Fibroblast Growth Factor Receptor (FGFR) Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor, in Subjects With Advanced or Refractory Solid Tumors or Lymphoma

1) To determine a safe and biologically active Phase 2 dose (recommended Phase 2 dose [RP2D]) for JNJ-42756493 (Part 1 Dose Escalation)
2) To evaluate the feasibility of treating a molecularly-defined subset of subjects with squamous celllung cancer and subjects with breast cancer with JNJ-42756493 at the RP2D (Part 2 Dose Expansion)
(More)


041310

Multicenter Randomized Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Phase 3 Trial of Fulvestrant with or without Palbociclib +/- Goserelin in Women with Hormone Receptor Positive Breast Cancer Whose Disease Progressed after Prior Endocrine Therapy

Primary Objective:
To demonstrate the superiority of palbociclib in combination with fulvestrant (with or without goserelin) over fulvestrant (with or without goserelin) alone in prolonging investigator-assessed PFS in women with HR+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer whose disease has progressed on prior endocrine therapy.
(More)


041314

S1207: Phase III Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial Evaluating the Use of Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy +/- One Year of Everolimus in Patients with High-Risk, Hormone Receptor-Positive and HER2/neu Negative Breast Cancer

1.1 Primary Objective

The primary objective of this study is to compare whether the addition of one year of everolimus (10 mg daily) to standard adjuvant endocrine therapy improves invasive disease-free survival (IDFS) in patients with high-risk, hormone-receptor (HR) positive and HER2-negative breast cancer.

1.2 Secondary Objectives

a. To compare whether the addition of one year of everolimus to standard adjuvant endocrine therapy improves overall survival (OS) and distant recurrence-free survival (DRFS) in this patient population.

b. To evaluate the safety, toxicities and tolerability of one year of everolimus in combination with standard adjuvant endocrine therapy and compare it with standard adjuvant endocrine therapy plus placebo in this patient population.

c. To determine whether the benefit of one year of everolimus use in addition to standard adjuvant endocrine therapy varies by recurrence score (RS), nodal status, or other commonly used prognostic factors.

d. To evaluate adherence to 1-year treatment of everolimus in comparison to placebo in addition to standard adjuvant endocrine therapy in this patient population.
e. To collect specimens in order to evaluate biomarkers of therapeutic efficacy.
(More)


051101

Phase I Study of Pazopanib in Combination with Weekly Paclitaxel and Carboplatin to Assess the Safety and Tolerability in Patients with Advanced Solid Tumors

1.1 Primary Objective(s)
1.1.1 Determine the safety and tolerability of pazopanib in combination with weekly paclitaxel and weekly carboplatin on Days 1, 8, and 15 every 28 days in patients with advanced solid tumors.
1.1.2 Determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of pazopanib in combination with weekly paclitaxel and weekly carboplatin on Days 1, 8, and 15 every 28 days in patients with advanced solid tumors.
1.1.3 Determine the effect of pazopanib on the pharmacokinetics of paclitaxel and carboplatin.
1.2 Secondary Objective(s)
1.2.1 Assess the clinical activity of pazopanib in combination with paclitaxel and carboplatin administered weekly in patients with solid tumors and in a cohort of triple-negative breast cancer patients.
1.2.2 Evaluate the change in circulating tumor cells in peripheral blood serially in patients enrolled in the dose expansion.
1.2.3 Evaluate blood-based biomarkers, such as cytokines and angiogenic factors (CAF) as potential markers for biological activity, therapeutic sensitivity, or resistance, in patients enrolled in the dose expansion.
(More)


041110

A Randomized Phase 2 Study of the Efficacy and Tolerability of Veliparib in Combination with Temozolomide or Veliparib in Combination with Carboplatin and Paclitaxel Versus Placebo Plus Carboplatin and Paclitaxel in Subjects with BRCA1 or BRCA2 Mutation and Metastatic Breast Cancer

Objectives: The primary objective of the study is to assess the progression-free survival (PFS) of oral
veliparib in combination with temozolomide (TMZ) or in combination with carboplatin and paclitaxel
compared to placebo plus carboplatin and paclitaxel in subjects with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation and
metastatic breast cancer.
The secondary objectives of the study are to assess overall survival (OS), clinical benefit rate (CBR),
and objective response rate (ORR) in those subjects treated with veliparib plus TMZ or treated with
veliparib plus carboplatin and paclitaxel versus placebo plus carboplatin and paclitaxel.
The tertiary objectives are to assess Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status
and quality of life (QoL).
(More)


081210

ECOG E2810: Randomized, Double-Blind Phase III Study of Pazopanib vs. Placebo in Patients with Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Who Have No Evidence of Disease Following Metastatectomy

1 .To evaluate disease-free survival with pazopanib as compared to placebo, defined as the time from randomization to the development of recurrent disease, second primary cancer (other than localized breast, localized prostate, or non-melanoma skin cancer) or death from any cause for patients with metastatic RCC with no evidence of disease following metastatectomy.
(More)


051207

M13-695: A Phase I Study to Evaluate the Safety, Pharmacokinetics and Oral Bioavailability of Veliparib Extended Release Formulations in Subjects with Solid Tumors

Assess and compare the bioavailability of three test extended release (ER) formulations of veliparib with that of the current imemdiate release formulation of veliparib. Evaluate the potential effect of food on the oral bioavailability of three test extended release (ER) formulations of veliparib. Establish the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and to establish the recommended Phase 2 dose (RPTD) and schedule for one or more of the ER formulations. Secondary objectives of the study are to assess the safety and tolerability of the ER formulations.
(More)


051208

TAC113886: A Phase I Dose Escalation Open-Label, Safety, Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Study to Determine the Recommended Phase II Dose of GSK1120212 Dosed in Combination with GSK2141795

Primary: Part 1A: To determine the safety, tolerability and recommended Phase II dose of GSK1120212 and GSK2141795 administered in combination orally, once daily continuously. Part 1B: To determine the safety, tolerability and recommended Phase II dose of GSK1120212 and GSK2141795 administered in combination with an alternate schedule (i.e., at least one agent is dosed intermittently). Part 2A, 2B: To evaluate the clinical activity of GSK1120212 and GSK2141795 administered in combination in subjects with solid tumors that are predicted to be sensitive to the inhibition of MEK and/or AKT, including TNBC and BRAF-wild type melanoma.
Secondary: (1) To characterize the PK of GSK1120212 and GSK2141795 for a once daily continuous dosing schedule (Part 1A) and/or an intermittent dosing schedule (Part 1B). (2) Part 1A, Part 1B to evaluate the clinical activity of GSK1120212 and GSK2141795 in subjects with solid tumors. (3) Parts 1 and 2, to characterize the durability of response with GSK1120212 and GSK2141795 dosed orally in combination. (4) To evaluate the pharmacodynamic (PD) response in tumors after treatment with the combination of GSK1120212 and GSK2141795. (5) To explore relationships between study drug PK, PD and clinical activity.
Translational: To explore the association of clinical and PD endpoints with genetic and protein profiles from blood and/or tumor tissue.
(More)


041304

A Study of Neratinib Plus Capecitabine Versus Lapatinib Plus Capecitabine in Patients with Her2+ Metastatic Breast Cancer Who Have Received Two or More Prior Her2-Directed Regimens in the Metastatic Setting

The co-primary objectives of this study are:
1) to compare independently adjudicated PFS following treatment with neratinib plus capecitabine versus lapatinib plus capecitabine in patients with HER2+ MBC who have received two or more prior HER2-directed regimens in the metastatic setting.
2) to compare OS following treatment with neratinib plus capecitabine versus lapatinib plus capecitabine in this population.
3.2 Secondary Objectives
The secondary objectives of this study are to compare between the two treatment groups:Investigator-assessed PFS, Objective response rate (ORR), duration of response (DOR) and clinical benefit rate (CBR)
(complete response [CR] or partial response [PR] or stable disease [SD] ?24 weeks), time to intervention for symptomatic metastatic central nervous system (CNS) disease, safety (AEs, serious adverse events [SAEs]), health outcomes assessments.
(More)


041301

20110148: Randomized, single-blind study to estimate the effect of patient education on reported bone pain in breast cancer patients receiving chemotherapy and pegfilgrastim

To estimate the difference between arms in mean maximum severity of
subject-reported bone pain in cycle 1
(More)


130404

THE WOMEN'S CIRCLE OF HEALTH STUDY


(More)